Words For Pictures

A study in panel borders:
Inspired by this awesome post about making comics quickly, I took a look at some comics I own to get some sense of different kinds of panel design choices.

I came away feeling like I’d learned a little less than I’d hoped, but here are some takeaways:

* You can get away with smaller panels than you think
* Extremely weird comic panels CAN work, but when it fails it looks painful and forced.
* Simple is not bad.
* There are actually a LOT of possible combinations.

Specific notes:

Scott McCloud uses a 4x3 sliceup of the page, and it’s four VERTICAL slices and three HORIZONTAL ones, which is weird because it makes the panels, on average, LESS square. This works with the particular comic really WELL though, because he draws himself in closeup, talking, a LOT.

DAR and Narbonic both are webcomics mashed into book format, but both worked surprisingly well as page layout in the end.

Blacksad is REALLY variable and the page layouts are hand-crafted on a per-page basis. No speed gains here, but perhaps a message that full custom has its place.

The Resonator is fairly formal but never *too* rigid with panel choices. Lots of narrow or tall panels, which works as a way to alternate between big establishing shots and dense dialog. Very tall panels for single speaker, long ones for two-person dialog or to combine a lot of text and visuals. In general, Resonator is print-native and has TINY text…

Ultimate X-Men is a fun read but the panel design is a disaster. Almost none of the choices of graphic design work at all. Occasionally an establishing shot hits home, but in general the layout is trying WAY too hard.

Watchmen. Formalism raised to the ultimate. It’s precise, it’s a 3x3 grid, it’s piss-on-a-plate-with-no-spills precise and that’s fine, for two reasons: one, everything is about time, and two, it gets the panels the hell out of the way of the story.

Augustus is an example of what Ultimate X-Men was trying to do, except it succeeds. Lots of variation, but on average very orderly. Kind of strikes me as the sort of thing you “have to be GOOD” to pull off well.

(Source: captainmwai, via xcyclopswasrightx)

  1. timmurr reblogged this from thelastinterceptor
  2. thetalonforyourhead reblogged this from thelastinterceptor
  3. alongstrangeride reblogged this from thelastinterceptor
  4. thelastinterceptor reblogged this from bendiswordsforpictures
  5. katrinaboil reblogged this from suitelifeofzachandcas
  6. omalleykatt reblogged this from suitelifeofzachandcas
  7. hyourinmaruice reblogged this from wizadler
  8. suitelifeofzachandcas reblogged this from oyasumirosie
  9. wizadler reblogged this from oyasumirosie
  10. oyasumirosie reblogged this from adriofthedead
  11. hotcocoa72 reblogged this from jannelle-o
  12. bigbadbot reblogged this from ultimateserialkiller
  13. coyotewild reblogged this from askfordoodles
  14. scarsonmyhands reblogged this from captainmwai
  15. choco-marshmallowy-clouds reblogged this from tuna-soup
  16. 0ct0puz reblogged this from tuna-soup
  17. ringerparadox reblogged this from tuna-soup
  18. tuna-soup reblogged this from plerndraws
  19. demongiraffe reblogged this from plerndraws
  20. spikeyboyfriend reblogged this from psychoass
  21. psychoass reblogged this from plerndraws
  22. plerndraws reblogged this from p5a
  23. p5a reblogged this from personafives-deactivated281029
  24. oakandthunder reblogged this from panjikant and added:
    Useful. (correct re-blog this time. )
  25. janpospisil reblogged this from panjikant and added:
    This will be useful.