Words For Pictures

A study in panel borders:
Inspired by this awesome post about making comics quickly, I took a look at some comics I own to get some sense of different kinds of panel design choices.

I came away feeling like I’d learned a little less than I’d hoped, but here are some takeaways:

* You can get away with smaller panels than you think
* Extremely weird comic panels CAN work, but when it fails it looks painful and forced.
* Simple is not bad.
* There are actually a LOT of possible combinations.

Specific notes:

Scott McCloud uses a 4x3 sliceup of the page, and it’s four VERTICAL slices and three HORIZONTAL ones, which is weird because it makes the panels, on average, LESS square. This works with the particular comic really WELL though, because he draws himself in closeup, talking, a LOT.

DAR and Narbonic both are webcomics mashed into book format, but both worked surprisingly well as page layout in the end.

Blacksad is REALLY variable and the page layouts are hand-crafted on a per-page basis. No speed gains here, but perhaps a message that full custom has its place.

The Resonator is fairly formal but never *too* rigid with panel choices. Lots of narrow or tall panels, which works as a way to alternate between big establishing shots and dense dialog. Very tall panels for single speaker, long ones for two-person dialog or to combine a lot of text and visuals. In general, Resonator is print-native and has TINY text…

Ultimate X-Men is a fun read but the panel design is a disaster. Almost none of the choices of graphic design work at all. Occasionally an establishing shot hits home, but in general the layout is trying WAY too hard.

Watchmen. Formalism raised to the ultimate. It’s precise, it’s a 3x3 grid, it’s piss-on-a-plate-with-no-spills precise and that’s fine, for two reasons: one, everything is about time, and two, it gets the panels the hell out of the way of the story.

Augustus is an example of what Ultimate X-Men was trying to do, except it succeeds. Lots of variation, but on average very orderly. Kind of strikes me as the sort of thing you “have to be GOOD” to pull off well.

(Source: captainmwai, via xcyclopswasrightx)

  1. rubyredro5e reblogged this from captainmwai
  2. technicaldumb reblogged this from thefishcrow
  3. oppositesignal reblogged this from ladyzolstice
  4. thefishcrow reblogged this from artiststoolbox
  5. spelldubbin reblogged this from scrawls
  6. dollyazucar reblogged this from donatsuhime
  7. comicgone reblogged this from playingfordean
  8. bi-planeandsimple reblogged this from playingfordean
  9. cbjeebies reblogged this from thisnameyoucanactuallypronounce
  10. shatterdomescientist reblogged this from playingfordean
  11. playingfordean reblogged this from 23winchester-drive
  12. 23winchester-drive reblogged this from thisnameyoucanactuallypronounce
  13. thisnameyoucanactuallypronounce reblogged this from captainmwai
  14. koneji reblogged this from refrii
  15. i-draw-too reblogged this from art-and-sterf
  16. tutorial-stuff reblogged this from tall-soy-latte
  17. irismessanger reblogged this from cookiekhaleesi
  18. xxcron reblogged this from goodra-commander
  19. dantesan reblogged this from sir0d
  20. goodra-commander reblogged this from tall-soy-latte
  21. sir0d reblogged this from tall-soy-latte
  22. tall-soy-latte reblogged this from mcgroodzhasdoodles
  23. agnete1994 reblogged this from cookiekhaleesi