Words For Pictures

A study in panel borders:
Inspired by this awesome post about making comics quickly, I took a look at some comics I own to get some sense of different kinds of panel design choices.

I came away feeling like I’d learned a little less than I’d hoped, but here are some takeaways:

* You can get away with smaller panels than you think
* Extremely weird comic panels CAN work, but when it fails it looks painful and forced.
* Simple is not bad.
* There are actually a LOT of possible combinations.

Specific notes:

Scott McCloud uses a 4x3 sliceup of the page, and it’s four VERTICAL slices and three HORIZONTAL ones, which is weird because it makes the panels, on average, LESS square. This works with the particular comic really WELL though, because he draws himself in closeup, talking, a LOT.

DAR and Narbonic both are webcomics mashed into book format, but both worked surprisingly well as page layout in the end.

Blacksad is REALLY variable and the page layouts are hand-crafted on a per-page basis. No speed gains here, but perhaps a message that full custom has its place.

The Resonator is fairly formal but never *too* rigid with panel choices. Lots of narrow or tall panels, which works as a way to alternate between big establishing shots and dense dialog. Very tall panels for single speaker, long ones for two-person dialog or to combine a lot of text and visuals. In general, Resonator is print-native and has TINY text…

Ultimate X-Men is a fun read but the panel design is a disaster. Almost none of the choices of graphic design work at all. Occasionally an establishing shot hits home, but in general the layout is trying WAY too hard.

Watchmen. Formalism raised to the ultimate. It’s precise, it’s a 3x3 grid, it’s piss-on-a-plate-with-no-spills precise and that’s fine, for two reasons: one, everything is about time, and two, it gets the panels the hell out of the way of the story.

Augustus is an example of what Ultimate X-Men was trying to do, except it succeeds. Lots of variation, but on average very orderly. Kind of strikes me as the sort of thing you “have to be GOOD” to pull off well.

(Source: captainmwai, via xcyclopswasrightx)

  1. daartblog reblogged this from art-tutorials-for-all
  2. mylittlechimera reblogged this from art-tutorials-for-all
  3. chibwe reblogged this from rei-kuun
  4. rei-kuun reblogged this from paradedemon
  5. paradedemon reblogged this from art-tutorials-for-all
  6. art-tutorials-for-all reblogged this from commanderawesome
  7. monchopin reblogged this from sarahanndippity
  8. sarahanndippity reblogged this from mozaikmage
  9. summerstorms reblogged this from strangelykt
  10. mozaikmage reblogged this from kaname-madokis
  11. kaname-madokis reblogged this from creekdontrise
  12. gecab reblogged this from alvadee
  13. commanderawesome reblogged this from commanderawesome
  14. flexbot5000 reblogged this from chipperwhale
  15. literiot reblogged this from oldmanstephanie
  16. lisette-refs reblogged this from krystalsfartblog
  17. sempermiror reblogged this from captainmwai
  18. pfmzkzrefs reblogged this from artiststoolbox
  19. bleaf reblogged this from captainmwai and added:
    neat breakdown of panel layouts.